2018, Issue 11, Volume 10

CROPPING PATTERN AND ECONOMICS OF CEREALS PRODUCTION IN DIVERSE SEASONS OF UTTARAKHAND HILLS

Sheela Kharkwal1*and Ravindra Malhotra2

1 Department of Agricultural Economics, SKNAU Jobner, Rajasthan 321001

2 Division of Dairy Economics, Statistics and Management, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute (deemed University), Karnal, Haryana 132001

Email: sheela.kharkwal91@gmail.com

Received-09.11.2018, Revised-27.11.2018

Abstract: This study was aimed at identifying cropping pattern in Uttarakhand state and analyzing cost, return and profitability of cereals in different seasons. The study is based on the both primary and secondary sources and has made use of the farm level cross-sectional data collected through multistage random sampling technique from 200 sample farmers belonging to different hill altitudes. To estimate cost major inputs like labor, farmyard manure, fertilizer, seeds, animal feed etc were identified and valued at the prevailing market rates. Returns were estimated by multiplying quantities produced of particular crop and current market prices. Results indicated a cropping intensity of 188% and the cereal crops accounted for around 70% of the gross cropped area. Wheat emerged as the main food grain crop in the study area with its percentage share of 26.98% in the gross cropped area, while paddy (24.21%) was the second major cereal crop in the study area. The cost of cultivation of cereals summer season (` 11704/acre) was slightly less than that of cereals in winter season (` 11866/acre). Per acre net return from cereals was found to be higher for winter season (` 11237.7/acre) when compared to wheat summer season (` 8420.37/acre).

Keywords: Cereals, Cropping pattern, Cost of cultivation, Net returns, Seasons

REFERENCES

Ahluwalia, M.S. (1978). Rural poverty and agricultural performance in India, Journal of Development Studies, 14(2): 298-323.

Deshpande, R.S. and Arora Ed. (2010). Agrarian crisis and farmers suicides, Sage Publications, New Delhi.

Hussain, I. and Hanjra, M.A. (2003). Does irrigation water matter for rural poverty alleviation? Evidence from South and South-East Asia, Water Policy, 5(5-6): 429-442.

Hussain, I. and Hanjra, M.A. (2004). Irrigation and poverty alleviation: review of the empirical evidence, Irrigation and Drainage, 53(1): 1-15.

Kalamkar, S.S. and Narayanamoorthy, A. (2003). Impact of liberalization on domestic agricultural prices and farm income, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(3): 353-364.

Kumar, P., Singh, N.P. and Mathur, V.C. (2006). Sustainable agriculture and rural livelihoods: a synthesis. Agricultural Economics Research Review,19: 1-22.

Narayanamoorthy, A. (2006).Relief package for farmers: can it stop suicides? Economic and Political Weekly, 41(31): 3353-3355.

Pant, P. and Srivastava, S.K. (2014).Economics of finger millet cultivation in hills of kumaon region of Uttarakhand. Journal of Hill Agriculture, 5(1): 13-18.

Pushpa, Srivastava, S.K. and Agarwal, P.K. (2017). Comparative study on cost of cultivation and economic returns from major crops in eastern region of Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology. 10(3): 387-399

Sainath, P. (2010). Farm Suicides – A 12 year Saga, The Hindu, January 25.

Saleth, M.R., Samad, M., Molden, D. and Hussain, I. (2003). Water, poverty and gender: a review of issues and policies, Water Policy, 5(5-6): 385-98.

Singh, H.N., Singh, S., Singh, U.S., Singh J., Zaidi, N.W. and Mohanty, S. (2013). Economic evaluation of Pusa rice hybrid 10 cultivation: a micro economic evidence of Uttarakhand, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 12(3): 472-477.

Sureshkumar, A.P., Patel, K. S., Asodiya, P.S. and Parmar, V.K. (2014). Input use, costs structure, return and resource use efficiency analysis of wheat crop in South Gujarat, India. International Journalof Agricultural Extension, 2(1):05-12.

Verma A.K., Ahirwar R.F. and Thakur, U.S. (2016).Cost of cultivation and resource use efficiency of major rabi crops in Vidisha district of Madhya Pradesh. Economic Affairs, 61(2): 231-237.