2017, Issue 3, Volume 9

NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY WEEDS AND PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) AS INFLENCED BY DIFFERENT HERBICIDE COMBINATIONS

Anil Kumar Mawalia*, Vikas Vishnu, Dinesh Kumar and Deep Singh Rajpurohit

Department of Agronomy, N.M. College of Agriculture, NAU, Navsari Gujarat-396450

1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding NMCA, NAU, Navsari Gujarat-396450

Email: anilmawalia@gmail.com

Received-01.02.2017, Revised-02.03.2017

Abstract: A field experiment was carried out during the winter season of 2012-13 and 2013-14 at Palampur to evolve an effective herbicide combination on nutrient depletion by weeds in pea (Pisum sativum L.). In the present study, pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb HW (45 DAS)andpendimethalin 1000 g/ha (Pre)fb imazethapyr + imazamox 60 g/ha (45 DAS) resulted in significantly lower total weed dry weight over other herbicidal treatments.All the herbicide combinations were comparable to weed free in reducing the GRw between 90-120 DAS. Pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb HW (45 DAS), pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb imazethapyr + imazamox 60 g/ha (45 DAS) were as effective as weed free in reducing NPK uptake by weeds. Weeds in weedy check removed 49.3 kg/ha N, 19.7 kg/ha P and 44.7 kg/ha K depriving thereby the crop for that much amount of nutrients. Most of the treatments were results in significantly higher crop dry matter accumulation. Significantly higher green pod yield and NPK uptake by crop were obtained in weed free, pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb HW (45 DAS) and pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb imazethapyr + imazamox 60 g/ha (45 DAS) treatments.Herbicide combinations in general were better than sole application of herbicides in effectively reducing the NPK uptake by weeds and increasing NPK uptake by crop.

Keywords: Hand weeding, Imazethapyr, Nutrient uptake, Peas, Pendimethalin

REFERENCES

Casarini, B., Poldini, L. and Silvestri, G. (1996). Experimental studies on weed control in peas grown for processing. Industria Conserve 3:15.

Dubey,Y.P., Kaistha, B.P. and Jaggi, R.C. (1999). Influence of irrigation and phosphorus on growth, green pod yield and nutrient uptake of pea (Pisum sativum L,) in Lahaul valley of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy 44: 137-140.

Kumar,D., Angiras, N.N., Singh, Y. and Rana, S.S. (2005). Influence of integrated weed management practices on weed competition for nutrient in wheat. Indian Journal of Agriculture Research 39(2): 110-115.

Kumar, S. and Singh, C.M. (1994). Integrated weed management in vegetable pea (Pisum sativum) under dry temperate condition. Indian Journal of Weed Science 26: 40-44.

Ramia, J., Christian, B. and Rainer, G.J. (2013). Organic fertilizer effects on pea yield, nutrient uptake, microbial root colonization and soil microbial biomass indices in organic farming systems. European Journal of Agronomy49: 32-41.

Rana, M.C., Nag, M., Rana, S.S. and Sharma, G.D. (2013). Influence of post-emergence herbicides on weeds and productivity of garden peas (Pisum sativum) under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh.IndianJournal of Agronomy 58: 226-230.

Singh, C.M., Angiras, N.N. and Kumar, S. (1996). Weed management. M.D Publications, New      Delhi. pp50.

Tripathi, B., Kumar, C.P.C., Rengarajan, T., Chandurkar, P.S. and Vijaylakshmi (1993). Pendimethalin, metolachlor residues in soil microflora, weed spectrum and green pea      (Pisum sativum L.) yield. Proceedings of Indian Society of Weed Science,             International Symposium, Hisar, India 11: 98-100.

Vaishya, R.D., Rai, O.P. and Singh, R.K. (1999). Weed Control in pea with pre and post-emergence herbicide. Indian Journal of Pulse Research12: 201-205.

Wagner, G. and Nadasy, E. (2007). Competition between green pea and its summer annual weeds. Analele Universitatii din Oradea, Fascicula: Protectia Mediului XII.