2014, Issue 3, Volume 6

COMPARATIVE CYPSELAR FEATURES OF TWO SPECIES OF TAGETES (TAGETEAE-ASTERACEAE) AND THEIR TAXONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE

Bidyut Kumar Jana and Sobhan Kumar Mukherjee

Taxonomy and Biosystematics Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Kalyani,
Kalyani-741235, Nadia, West Bengal, India.

Email: janabotanytaxonomy@gmail.com, sobhankr@gmailcom

Abstract : Morphological and anatomical studies of cypselas in Tagetes lucida L. and Tagetes  tenuifolia L. have been-carried out in details with the help of light microscope. Some morphological features like cypselar surface hairs,  carpopodium, detachment area, pappus bristles have potential value for characterization. Anatomically, phytomelanin layer is present in the mesocarpic region and which is continuous in case of  Tagetes  tenuifolia and discontinuous in case of  Tagetes lucida. In the cypsela of  Tagetes lucida, testa and endosperm layers are uniseriately arranged, whereas in Tagetes  tenuifolia, testal layer is uniseriately arranged but endosperm layer is biseriately arranged. Based on the above mention morpho – anatomical features, an artificial key to the studied taxa  has been constructed.

Keywords: Diacritical features; tageteae; asteraceae

REFERENCES

Bremer, K. (1987). Tribal interrelationships of the Asteraceae. Cladistics 3: 210–253.

Bremer, K. (1994). Asteraceae Cladistics  and  Classification. Portland Oregon: Timber Press.

Bremer, K. (1996). Major clades and grades of the Asteraceae. In D. J. Hind and H. J. Hind and H. J. Beentije (eds.), Compositae :Systematics. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994 (D. J. N. Hind. Editor – in – chief), Vol. 1 :1 – 7. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

Cassini, H. (1819). Sixieme memoire sur la famille des Synantherees, contenant les caracteres des  tribus. J. Phys. Chim. Hist. Nat. Arts 88: 150-163, 189-204.

Cassini, H. (1829). Tableau synoptique des Synantherees. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Paris 17: 387–423.

Crawford, D.J. and Tadesse, M. (2014). The phytomelanin layer in traditional members of  Bidens and Coreopsis and phylogeny of the Coreopsideae (Compositae). Nordic. J. Bot. 32: 80-91.

Decandolle, A. P. (1836). Compositae, Part I. In Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, vol. 5. Paris: Treuttel and Wurtz.

Dennis, J, Loockerman, Billie L. Turner, and Robert K. Jansen (2003). Phylogenetic relationships within the Tageteae (Asteraceae)  based on nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Systematic Botany 28 (1):191–207.

Funk, V.A., Susanna, A., Stuessy, T.F. and Robinson, H. (2009). Classification of Compositae. In: Funk, V.A., Susanna, A., Stuessy, T.F. and Bayer, R.J. (eds.). Systematics,  Evolution and Biogeography of Compositae. 171-192, Vienna, IAPT.

Johansen,  D. A. (1940). Plant Microtechnique. Mc Graw Hill, New york.

Kadereit, J. W.  and   Jeffrey, C. (Eds.). (2007). Flowering  Plants: Eudicots- Asterales.  In Kubitzki, K. (Ed.). The  Families  and  Genera  of  Vascular  Plants. Vol. VIII, Springer, Berlin, Germany.

Lessing, C. F. (1832). Synopsis Generum Compositarum. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot

Mukherjee,  S. K. and Sarkar A. K. (1999). Diacritical features of cypsela in Tagetes minuta L. of the tribe Tageteae (Asteraceae)with the aid of LM and SEM. Int. J. Mendel,16 (1-2), 9-10.

Mukherjee, S. K. and Sarkar, A. K. (1994). Morpho – anatomical  studies of cypselas in some members of the tribe Inuleae (Asteraceae) witht he help of SEM. J. Natl. Bot. Soc. 48 : 19 -39.

Mukherjee. S. K. (1992). Carpological Studies in Compositae. Ph.D thesis, Kalyani University, W. B., India. (Unpublish).

Pandey, A.K., Stuessy, T.F. and Mathur, R.R. (2014). Phytomelanin and systematic of the Heliantheae Allianee (Compositae). Plant. Div. Evol. 131 (1-2): 1-21.

Panero, J.L. and Funk, V.A. (2002). Toward a phylogenetic subfamilial classification for the Compositae (Asteraceae). Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington. 115: 909-922.

Panero, J.L. and Funk, V.A. (2008). The value of sumpling anomalous taxa in phylogenetic studies: major clades of the Asteraceae revealed. Mo 1. Phylogenet. Evol. 47: 757-782.

Soule, J. A. (1993). The Biosystematics of Tagetes. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Texas. Austin.

Strother, J. L. (1977). Tageteae – Systematic Review. In V. H. Heywood et as. (eds), The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, Vol. 2. 769 – 783. Academic Press, London.