2018, Issue 3, Volume 10

STUDY ON EFFECTS OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON MONETARY ADVANTAGES AND QUALITY OF SESAME BASED INTERCROPPING WITH KHARIF SEASON CROPS

Gautam Veer Chauhan, Ram Pyare, Vivek Kumar Trivedi*, Sandeep Kumar and
Harshita Sharma

Department of Agronomy, *Deptt. Of Soil and Soil Chemistry,

Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology,

Kanpur-208002(U.P.)

Received-04.03.2018, Revised-22.03.2018

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted during at SIF, C.S. Azad University of Agriculture & Technology,Kanpur-208002 (UP) during two Kharif seasons of 2015 and 2016. The experiment consisted 12 treatments having four intercropping viz, sesame + maize (4:1), sesame + maize (8:2), sesame + urd (4:1) and sesame + urd (8:2) and three weed management practices viz, Hand weeding, Pre-emergence of Pandimethaline 30% EC@3.0 L/ha and Early post-emergence of Alachlor 50% EC@ 0.75 kg/ha replicated four times. The experiment was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design. The main crop as Sesame of Shekhar variety and sub crops as Maize of P-3441 variety and urd of Shekhar-2 variety were used in the study year. The all weed flora were counted significantly lowest, in treatment of sesame + urd (8:2) inter cropping composed to remaining intercropping treatment during both the years, respectively. The grain yield of sesame was significantly higher produced in sesame + urd (8:2) treatment over other rest treatment during 2015 and 2016 years, respectively.The grain yield of maize and urd intercrops with sesame in 8:2 row ratio was statistically higher produced than 4:1 row ratio during both the years except urd intercrop in second year only. The monetary benefits of main crop (sesame) was recorded significantly more with sesame + urd (8:2) inter cropping over used rest intercropping during both the years, respectively. The intercropping of sesame + urd (8:2) were found significantly higher quality parameters viz., protein and oil content over sesame + maize (4:1), sesame + maize (8:2) and sesame + urd (4:1) intensively during both the years, respectively. The hand weeding practice was significantly reduced weed populations, over chemical weed management practices as pre-emergence of Pendimethaline and early post emergence of Alachlor, respectively during both years. The response of weed management practices was significantly noted in hand weeding practice in respect to grain yield of main crop (sesame) and sub crop (Maize and urd) over applied chemical weedicides as pendimethaline and Alachlor during both the years, respectively. The monetary advantages viz., system of productivity and profitability and quality aspects viz, protein and oil content with hand weeding practice were significantly more than applied both chemical control of pendimethaline and Alachlors in both the years, respectively. Therefore, inter cropping sesame + ured (8:2) with hard weeding practice may be recommended in respect to all weed populations reduced more produced grain yield of main and sub crop monetary advantages and quality aspects.

Keywords: Weed management, Crops, Kharif, Treatment

REFERENCES

Nasri, R., Kashani, A., Barary, M., Paknejad, F. and Vazan, S. (2014). Nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency and the productivity of wheat in double cropping system under different rates of nitrogen. International Journal of Biosciences (IJB). 4(4): 184-193.

Hailu, G. (2015) A view on the comparative advantages of intercropping to monocropping system.Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 5(9): 1-13.

Hanumathappa, M. and Dalawal, B.L. (2008). Growth and yield of sesame (Sesamum indcum) as influenced by intercropping and fertilizer levels. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Science 42(3): 440-443.

Ashoka, P., Setty, T.K.P., Krishnamurthy, N. and Screeramulu, K.R. (2013). Effect of intercrops and crop geometry on productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays L.) based intercropping. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 47(1): 199-201.

Ijoyah, M.O., Idoko, J.A. and Iorlamen, T. (2015). Effect of intra-row spacing of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and frequency of weeding on yields of maize-sesame intercrop in Makurdi, Nigeria. International Letters of Natural Sciences, 38:16-26.

Yadav, R.A., Singh, H.P., Yadav, M.P., Naushad, Khan, Chandra, D.R. and Yadav, R.S. (2008).Studies on intercropping in sesame involving new crop combination in Bundel-khand tract of U.P. Plant Archives, 8(2): 1007-1008.

Rathi, R. and P.K. (2012). Impact of improved technologies on the productivity and economics of sesame (sesamum indicum L.) at farmer’s field in Fatehpur district of U.P. Hind Agri. Horticultural Society, Muzaffarnagar, India, International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(1).

Yadav, P.N., Uttam, S.K., Singh R.P., Katiyar, S.C., Tripathi, A.K. and Kanaujia, D.K. (2013). Productivity, economic viability, water use efficiency, reciprocity functions and energy efficiency of sesame (Sesamum indicum) based intercropping in rainfed ecosystem, C.S. Azad University of Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences, 5(1): 59-63.

Bhatt, B.K., Dixit, S.K. and Darji, V.B. (2010).Monetary evaluation of sesame based intercropping systems. Journal of Agricultural Research 44(2): 146-149.

Pusadkar, P.P., Kokiladevi, E., Bonde, S.V. and Mohite, N.R. (2015). Sesame (sesame indicum L.) importance and its high quality seed oil: A review, Trends in Bio sciences, 8(15): 3900-3906.

Nurbakhsh, F., Koocheki, A. and Mohallati, M.N. (2013). Evaluation of yield, yield components and different intercropping idices in mixed and row intercropping of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Science Explorer Publication, U.K., International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Science (IJACS), 5(17): 1958-1965.

El-Dein, A.A. M.Z. (2015). Effect of intercropping and nitrogen fertilizer levels on yield and its components of soybean, sesame and cowpea with maize, Global Journal of Agriculture and Food Safety Sciences:2:319-331.

Grichar, W. and Dotray, P. (2007). Weed control and sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) response to preplan incorporated herbicides and method of incorporation. Crop Protect.26:1826-1830.

Bawa, S.S., Singh, S. and Sharma, S.C. (2015). Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) based intercropping for productivity, resource-use efficiency and competition indices in the rain fed foothills of northwest Himalayas. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,85(5): 614-621.

Chhetri, B., Dahal, D., Mahato, S.K. and Khawas, T. (2015). Moisture conservation practices in blackgram (Vignamungo) based intercropping system under rainfed condition, International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 7(3):454-459.

Mathukia R.K., Sagarka B.K., and Jadav C.N. (2015). Integrated weed management in summer sesame. Indian J. Weed Sci. 47(2): 150-152.

Mruthul T., Halepyati A.S. and B.M. Chittapur (2015). Chemical weed management in sesame (Sesame indicum L.) Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 28(2): 151-154.