2022, Issue 8, Volume 14

SCREENING OF BLACKGRAM GENOTYPES AGAINST POD BORER (HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA HUBNER)

Kriti Nigam1, P.K. Bhagat2, G.P. Painkra*3, K.L. Painkra4, Neelam Chouksey5

and Sachin Kumar Jaiswal6

1-4,6Department of Entomology, 5Department of Statistics, IGKV-Raj Mohini Devi College of Agriculture and Research Station, Ambikapur (497001) Surguja (Chhattisgarh), India

Email: krits.nigam@gmail.com

Received-25.07.2022, Revised-11.08.2022, Accepted-24.08.2022

Abstract: The research was carried out to investigate the screening of blackgram genotypes against pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) during Kharif season 2021 at experimental area of Research-cum-Instructional Farm of Raj Mohini Devi College of Agriculture and Research Station, Ambikapur, Surguja district of Chhattisgarh. The experiment was conducted in Randomized block design with three replications comprising of twelve genotypes and one check variety viz., Indira urd-1. The damage caused by pod borer was recorded at weekly interval i.e., 41 SMW (14th – 20th October) and 42nd SMW (21st – 27th October). All twelve genotypes were showed significantly difference with each other which ranges between 7.21 to 24.06 percent pod damage. Among blackgram genotypes minimum pod damage by H. armigera was observed in genotype IU 03-52 with 7.21 percent and categorized as resistant (R) while maximum pod damage was recorded in genotypes IU 02-1-3 with 24.06 percent were categorized as moderately resistant (MR). The data on grain damage were recorded at the time of harvest and was recorded minimum in IU 03-52 with 6.47 percent and maximum in IU 02-1-3 with 11.90 percent.

Keywords: Black gram, Genotypes, Pod damage, Pod borer, Screening, Vigna mungo

REFERENCES

Gupta, S. K., Souframanien, J. and Gopal, K. T. (2008). Construction of a genetic linkage map of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) based on molecular markers and comparative studies. Genome, 51: 628-637.

Google Scholar

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, John Wiley and sons publication, 2nd edition.

Google Scholar

Krishna, Y., Koteswara Rao, Y., Rao, R.S., Rajasekhar, P. and Srinivasa Rao, V. (2006). Screening for resistance against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) and Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in blackgram. Journal of Entomological Research, 30: 35-37.

Google Scholar

Kumar, M. and Singh, P.S. (2014). Screening of black gram genotypes against major insect pests. Indian Journal of Entomology, 76: 84-86.

Google Scholar

Nene, Y.L. (2006). Indian pulses through the millennia. Asian Agri. history, 10: 179-202.

Google Scholar

Pavithradevi, P. and Muthukumaran, N. (2021).Field screening of blackgram accessions for resistance against spotted pod borer Maruca vitrata (Geyer). International Journal of Entomology Research, 6(4): 242-244.

Google Scholar

Singh, P. and Kumar, R. (2019). Evaluation of Certain Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Genotypes for Resistance Against Major Sucking Insect Pests. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 12(2):135-139.

Google Scholar

Soundararajan, R.P. and Chitra, N. (2014). Field screening of blackgram, (Vigna mungo L.)  germplasm for resistance against pod borer complex. Indian Journal of Entomology, 76: 142-148.

Google Scholar

Tiwari, A.K. and Shivhare, A.K. (2016). Pulses in India: Retrospect and Prospectus. Published by Director, Govt. of India, Ministry of Agri. and Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Pulses Development, Vindhyachal Bhavan, Bhopal (M.P).

Google Scholar

Yadav, A., Singh, G., Yadav, A. and Singh, H. (2021). Screening of blackgram genotypes against major pod borers, Legume Research. An International Journal, 10.18805/LR-4686.

Google Scholar