2022, Issue 2, Volume 14

RESPONSE OF WEED CONTROL IN SESAME WITH PRE AND POST EMERGENCE HERBICIDES UNDER OLD ALLUVIAL ZONE OF WEST BENGAL

Asanul Hoque1, Abhijit Saha2, Biman Maity3* and Victor Sarkar4

1, 2Department of Agronomy, Culcutta university,

3, 4Department of Agricultural Extension, SMS Malda KVK

Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal-736165

Email: asanulhoque1994@gmail.com

Received-01.02.2022, Revised-18.02.2022, Accepted-27.02.2022

Abstract: Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) is one of the oldest crops known to humans. There are archeological remnants of sesame dating to 5500 BC in the Harappa Valley in the Indian subcontinent (Bedigian and Harlan 1986). India ranks first in area and second in sesame production by contributing 23.2% and 18.5% of the world area and production, respectively. The field experiment on evaluation of pre and post emergence herbicide for chemical weed management in sesame over summer season of 2020 was conducted at malda krishi vigyan kendra,old Alluvial Zone, Uttar Banga KrishiViswavidyalaya, Malda, West Bengal. The experimental site is situated at 26º8’N latitude and 78 º E longitudes having an average altitude of 8.75m above mean sea level. There were eight treatments, the details of which are given below T1- Weedy Check T2- Weed Free T3- Pendimethalin 30EC (Pre-emergence) @0.50 kg a.i/ha (R) /0.75 kg a.i/ ha (I) T4- Quizalofop-ethyl (Post emergence) 50g a.i /ha at 20 DAS after sowing T5- Sodium Acifluorfen 16.5% + Clodinafop -Propargyl 8%EC (Premix) @100g a.i/ ha at 20 DAS T6- T3+ Hand weeding at 20 DAS T 7- T3 f b T4 T8- T3 f b T5. Where weed free check recorded minimum weed density throughout the crop season. Similar findings was although obtained by Punya et al. (2001). At 30 DAS, the treatments which received T3- Pendimethalim 30 EC (Pre-emergence@0.50kg a.i./ha,T4- Quizalofop-ethyl (Post-emergence) 50g a.i/ha at 20 DAS T5- Sodium Acifluorfen 16.5%+Clodinafop-Propergyl 8% EC(premix)@100g a.i/ha at 20 DAS ,T6- T3+ Hand weeding at 20 DAS,T7-( T3+T4) and T8- T3+T5 and weed free check (T2) recorded lowest number of sedge, grass and broad leaved weed density than unweeded check(T1). Where weed free check recorded minimum weed density throughout the crop season. Similar findings were although obtained by Punya et al. (2001). At 30 DAS, the treatments which received T3- Pendimethalim 30 EC (Pre-emergence@0.50kg a.i./ha,T4- Quizalofop-ethyl (Post-emergence) 50g a.i/ha at 20 DAS T5- Sodium Acifluorfen 16.5%+Clodinafop-Propergyl 8% EC(premix)@100g a.i/ha at 20 DAS ,T6- T3+ Hand weeding at 20 DAS,T7-( T3+T4) and T8- T3+T5 and weed free check (T2) recorded lowest number of sedge, grass and broad leaved weed density than unweeded check(T1). With this view need proper weed management for increasing sesame productivity. Therefore, chemical weed management is most efficient and acceptable approach to combat with the weed control problems. Hence, present study was under taken.

Keywords: Pre and post emergence herbicide, Weed density, Weed control efficiency

Referneces

Bansode, B. U. and Shelke, D. K. (1991). Integrated weed management in sesamum. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ.,16(2): 275.

Google Scholar                                                                                                                                                                                     

Bartlett, M. S. (1947). Some examples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology.

Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, S. P., Mondal, Pal Debes and Saha, M. (2004). Bio-efficacy of Targa super (Quizalofop-ethyl 5% EC) in controlling weeds of Jute. Pestology, 28(4): 32-33.

Google Scholar

Bahaduri, Nisha, Arora, Asha and Yadav, K. S. (2012). Effect of weed management practices on seed yield and nutrient uptake in sesame. Indian J. Weed Sci., 44(2): 129–131.

Google Scholar

Baskaran, R. and Solaimalai, A. (2002). Role of weed management practices on yield attributes and yield of rice fallow sesame. Research on Crops, 32-36.

Google Scholar

Chauhan, D. V. S. and Gurjar, B. S. (1998). Mechanical and chemical weed control in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Indian J. Agron.,43(3): 480-483.

Google Scholar

Das, T. K. (2011). Weed science basics and applications, Jain brothers publications, New Delhi, India.

Google Scholar

James Grichar, David Sestak, Kevin Brewer, Brent Besler, Charles Stichler and Dudley Smith (2001). Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) tolerance with various post-emergence herbicides, Crop Prot., 20: 685-689.

Google Scholar

Kumar, Anil and Thakur, K.S. (2005). Effect of Sowing Method and Weed Control Practices on Production Potential of Sesamum (Sesamum indicum) Based lntercropping System under Rainfed Condition:Indian Journal of Weed Science37 (1&2), 133-134.

Google Scholar

Nisha Bhadauria, Yadav, K. S., Rajput, R. L. and Singh, V. B. (2012). Integrated weed management in sesame.Indian J. Weed Sci.,44(4): 235–237.

Google Scholar

Sumathl, V. V., Muneendra Babu, A. and Nagavani, A.V. (2000). Integrated weed management in rainfed groundnut (Ar,achis hypogaea L.). World Weeds, 5(1- 2) : 105-108.

Google Scholar

Venkatakrishnan, A. S. and Gnanamurthy (1998). Influence of varying period of crop weed competition in sesame. Indian J. Weed Sci., 30(3 & 4): 143-146.

Google Scholar

Venkatakrishnan, A. S. and Gnanamurthy, P. (1998). A preliminary evaluation of herbicides on the control of weeds in irrigated sesame. Sesame and Safflower Newsletter.,13: 77- 79.

Google Scholar