2024, Issue 8, Volume 16

IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF FARM MECHANIZATION AND AGRONOMIC CONSEQUENCES IN HDPS COTTON TO ENHANCE PRODUCTIVITY IN RANGAREDDY DISTRICT, TELANGANA

S. Vijayakumar, Gautam Veer Chauhan*, B. Sanjeevareddy, I. Srinivas, J. Prashanth, Ashish D. Satish, L. Harika, D. Suneeth, A.R. Reddy, Chandrakanth M.H. and V.K. Singh

ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500 059, Telangana

Krishi Vigyan Kendra-Rangareddy District

Email: gautamveer.chauhan@icar.gov.in

Received-10.07.2024, Revised-04.08.2024, Accepted-29.08.2024

Abstract: Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a major commercial crop in the rainfed regions of India and accounts for 23% of the total global production, playing a major role in sustaining the livelihood of 6 million cotton farmers, also known as “white gold”.In cotton cultivation lack of awareness among growers about the HDPS method and low adoption of agricultural mechanization Technologies has prevented farmers of Telangana from maximizing production benefits. The study aimedto evaluate the mechanization in the newly developed production technology High Density Planting System (HDPS) of cotton with crop spacing of 90 x 15 cm. The introduction of appropriate machinery operations in HDPS cotton greatly reduced the time up to 82%and labour requirement. The HDPS in combination with the mechanized method increased production per unit area by decreasing plant spacing from 45 x 15 cm and increasing plant density from 9,800 to 29,500 plants per acre. The practices gave maximum yield in HDPS cotton cultivation in the 27-32 q/ha range. The B:C ratio for mechanized HDPS cotton cultivation was 2.64 as compared to 1.44 for conventional cultivation.

Keywords: Cotton crop, Mechanization, Pneumatic planter, Drone, Stalk shredder  

References

Ansari, M. D. Shahim and Mahey, R.K. (2003). Growth and yield of cotton species as affected by sowing dates and nitrogen levels. Journal of Research Punjab Agriculture University, 40 (1): 8-11.

Google Scholar

Briggs, RE, Patterson, LL and Massey GD (1967). Within and between-row spacing of cotton. In: Arizona annual report. Arizona, UAS: College of Agriculture, University of Arizona; p. 6–7.

Google Scholar

Kumar, Pradeep, A. S. Karle, Deshraj Singh, and LalitaVerma (2017). Effect of high-density planting system (HDPS) and varieties on yield, economics and quality of desi cotton. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(3): 233-238.

Google Scholar

Lin T, Mei XR and Hao WP (2021). The effect of deficit irrigation on the yield and water utilization of machine picked cotton under condition of drip irrigation. Xinjiang Agric Sci., 58(3):419–29.

Google Scholar

Makamov, A., Shavkiev, J. and Kholmuradova, M. (2023). Cotton genotypes appraisal for morpho physiological and yield contributing traits under optimal and deficit irrigated conditions. J Breed Genet, 55(1):74–89.

Google Scholar

Nalayini, P. and Manickam, S. (2018). Agronomic manipulation of high strength cotton genotype, CCH4474 for yield maximization under irrigated agro ecosystem of Coimbatore, J. Cotton Res. Devel., 32(2):256–9.

Google Scholar

Stesi, S., Raju, M., Pazhanivelan, S., Ragunath, K. P. and Selvakumar, S. (2023). Impact of fertigation scheduling on growth, yield and yield attributes of cotton under high density planting system, The Pharma Innovation Journal, 12(9): 2116-2119.

Google Scholar

Venugopalan, MV, Waghmare, VN and Blaise, D. (2016). Cotton production and development in India. In: Gurung TR, Jahan FN, editors. Cotton technology exchange program in SAARC region. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Natundhara Printing Press:41–60.

Google Scholar