2022, Issue 11, Volume 14

EFFECT OF ORGANIC PRODUCTS ON PULSE BEETLE, CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS FAB. (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) INFESTING COWPEA

Shubham S. Patil1, Vaishali P. Sawant2* and Devadatta G. Jondhale3

1Department of Agril. Entomology, College of Agriculture, Dapoli. Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.).

2,3Regional Agricultural Research Station, Karjat, District–Raigad (M.S.).

Email: vps_25478@rediffmail.com

Received-06.11.2022, Revised-17.11.2022, Accepted-27.11.2022

Abstract: Pulses are mainly damaged by bruchids in storage. To manage pulse beetles/bruchids organically, the research work on ‘Effect of different organic products on pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) infesting cowpea’ was carried out in the laboratory at the Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Dapoli at room temperature 25 ± 30oC and Relative humidity 85 ± 2 per cent during the year 2019-20. Eight different organic products like Agniastra, Jeevamrit, Ghanajeevamrit, Brahmastra, Neemastra, Mixed-leaf extract, Dashparni extract and Chilli-Garlic extract at 3% concentration were tested against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. Homogenous fifth susceptible generation of pulse beetle, C. maculatus was taken as test insect and cowpea as a test pulse. During developmental studies, observations on efficacy of various parameters like fecundity, developmental period, adult emergence, adult longevity, weight loss, germination percentage etc. were recorded. Mean oviposition period of C. maculatus on cowpea ranged from 4 to 6.67 days, highest fecundity was observed in untreated control i.e. 679.67 and lowest in Dashparni extract i.e. 514.33 and same results observed in adult emergence i.e. 611.33 and 403.67. Due to different organic products, development period ranged from 22.67-27.00 days, adult longevity in female was ranging between 8.67 to 11.33 days whereas in male, it ranged from 7.00 to 9.67 days. Mean per cent weight loss ranged from 8.79 to 9.98% in cowpea. Mean germination percentage was highest in Jeevamrit and Ghanajeevamrit amongst all different pulses.

Keywords: Pulse beetle, cowpea, Callosobruchus maculates, chilli-garlic extract

REFERENCES

Ahmed, J., Maleque, M. A., Islam, M. S. and Bhuiyan, M.A. (2016). Evaluation of indigenous powder against pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) of stored chickpea. Journal of Sylhet Agricultural University, 3(2): 215-221.

Google Scholar

Bandaara, K. A. N. and Saxena, R. C. (1995). A technique for handing and sexing Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 31(1): 97-100.

Google Scholar 

Haines, C.P. (1988). Observations on Callosobruchus analis (F.) in Indonesia, including a key to storage Callosobruchus spp. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products and Research, 25(1):9-16.

Google Scholar

Kazemi, F., Talebi, A. A., Fathipour, Y. and Farahani, S. (2009). A Comparative Study on the Effect of Four Leguminous Species on Biological and Population Growth Parameters of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Col.: Bruchidae). Advances in Environmental Biology, 3(3): 226-232.

Google Scholar

Khare, B. P. (1993). Stored Grain Pests and Their Management. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana. 60-65.

Google Scholar

Moreno, R. A. P., Duque, G., A., Cruz, J. de la and Trochez, P. A. (2000). Remove from marked Records Life cycle and hosts of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Revista Colombiana de Entomologia, 26(3/4): 131- 135.

Google Scholar

Augustine, N. and Balikai, R.A. (2019). Biology of pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (Linnaeus) on cowpea variety DC[1]15. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 7(1): 513- 516.

Google Scholar

Osman, M. A. M., Mahmoud, M. F. and Mohamed, K. M. (2015). Susceptibility of Certain Pulse Grains to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Bruchidae: Coleoptera), and Influence of Temperature on Its Biological Attributes. Journal of Applied Plant Protection; Suez Canal University, 3: 9-15.

Google Scholar

Patel, V. K., Chaudhuri, N. and Senapati, S. K. (2005). Biology of pulse beetle (C. chinensis) as influenced by feeding of different grain pulses. Agriculture Science Digest, 25(4): 254-256.

Google Scholar

Patel, N. G. (2011). A Study on control measure of pulse beetle Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) Bruchidae: Coleoptera. International Journal of Biotechnology & Bioscience, 1: 25- 35.

Google Scholar

Raja, M. and William, S. J. (2008). Impact of volatile oils of plants against the cowpea beetle Callosobruchus maculates (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). International Journal of Integrative Biology, 2: 62-69.

Google Scholar

Romero, N. J. and Johnson, C. D. (2004). Checklist of the Bruchidae (Coleoptera) of Mexico. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 58: 613–635.

Google Scholar

Sagheer, M., Hasan, M., Ali, Z., Yasir, M., Ali, Q., Ali, K. and Khan, F.Z.A. (2013). Evaluation of essential oils of different citrus species against Trogoderma granarium (Everts.) (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) collected from Vehari and Faisalabad districts of Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Entomology, 35: 37-41.

Google Scholar

Sarda, V., Gopala Swamy, S.V.S., Madhumati, T. and Verma, P. K. (2018). Preference and Progeny development of Pulse beetle in response to Black gram treated with Botanicals and Inert materials. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 6(3): 1812-1815.

Google Scholar

Yadav, U. and Tiwari, R. (2017). Eco-friendly management of Sitophilus oryzae and Rhyzopertha dominica in stored wheat at Pantnagar, Uttarakhand. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 9(2): 736 – 743.

Google Scholar