2015, Issue 1, Volume 7

COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR OF WEED FLORA IN WETLAND RICE ECOSYSTEM AS INFLUENCED BY NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND SPACING

Sajith Babu, D., Sansamma George and Nishan, M.A.*

College of Agriculture, Vellayani,Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala-695522

Received-26.11.2014, Revised-17.12.2014

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala to study the extent of crop-weed competition for nutrients and space as influenced by nutrient managementand plant populationin a wetland rice ecosystem. The treatments included four levels of nutrient management and three levels of crop spacing. The results indicated that by altering nutrient management and adjusting the plant population, the competitive ability of rice crop could be improved and weed management made more efficient and economic.  During both the seasons, at 20 and 40 DAT, the weed  density and dry weight were the lowest when NPK @ 90:45: 45 kg ha-1 was applied with 25 per cent N as organic  while at 60 DAT the enhanced nutrient level of NPK @112.5:56:25:56.25 kg ha-1 applied with 25 per cent N as organic recorded the lowest weed density values. The general trend was that, though weed growth increased with increasing nutrient levels, partial organic substitution had a positive effect in suppressing weed growth.   At all growth stages the weed growth parameters were minimum in closer spacing of 15 X 15 cm. An overall analysis of the weed growth and crop performance indicated that the enhanced nitrogen especially when it is applied in an integrated manner with organic substitution benefited the rice crop more than the weeds through altering the micro environment in favour of rice.

Keywords: Crop, Nutrients, Spacing, Rice

REFERENCES

Bisht, P.S.; Pandey, P.C. and Lal, P. (1999). Plant population requirement of hybrid rice in the Tarai region of Uttar Pradesh, India. Int. Rice Res. Newsl.24(2):38

Brar, L.S.; Kolar, J.S. and Brar, L.S. (1997). Chemical control of Caesulia axillaris in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J. agron. 42: 82–85

Gallandt, E.R.; Liebman, M., Huggins, D.R. and Buhler, D.D. (1999). Improving soil quality : Implications for weed management. J. Crop Production.2 (1):95-121

Ghosh, D.C. and Singh, B.P. (1996). Effect of cultural practices on weed management and productivity of wetland rice. Indian J. agric. Res.30:123-126

Gogoi, A.K. (1998). Weed control in late-transplanted, lowland rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J. Agron.43:298-301

Gupta, O.P. (2009).Weed management Principles and practices, Agrobios, Jodhpur  293p.

Jacob, D. (2002). Impact of plant population and weed management practices on the performance of basmati rice. M.Sc.(Ag) thesis, KAU, Thrissur, 167 p.

Pamplona, R.R.; Dingkuhn, M.; Ampong Nyarko, K.;  Moll, C.J.  and De Datta, S.K. (1990). Tropical rice and weed competition for resources. In: 1990 Conference on Pest Management Council, Philippines. Bacolod City, Philippines.p.25

Rao, V.S. (2000). Principles of Weed Science. Oxford and IBH publishing Co., New Delhi, p.555

Sankar, P.A. (1979). Study of varietal response to planting geometry and weeding in transplanted rice. Allahabad farmer. 50 (4):357-358

Tomita, S.; Nawata, E.; Kono, Y.; Nagata, Y.; Noichana, C.; Sributta, A. and Inamura, T. (2003). Differences in weed vegetation in response to cultivating methods and water conditions in rainfed paddy fields in north – east Thailand. Weed Biol. and Mgmt.3(2):117-127.