2024, Issue 2, Volume 16

ASSESSMENT OF YIELD GAPS AND ECONOMICS THROUGH FRONTLINE DEMONSTRATION ON MOTH BEAN [VIGNA ACONITIFOLIA (JACQ.) MARECHAL] CULTIVATION IN THE ARID REGION OF WESTERN RAJASTHAN

Manmohan Puniya* and L.R. Choudhary

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Phalodi, Jodhpur-II, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342301

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Maulasar, (Nagaur-II), Agriculture University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan – 341506

Email: mmpuniya2011@gmail.com

Received-02.01.2024, Revised-20.01.2024, Accepted-22.02.2024

Abstract: Performance analysis in terms of gap analysis, yield enhancement and economic viability of improved production technologies of moth bean vis-a-vis farmer’s practices was evaluated through frontline demonstrations at farmer’s field during kharif, season 2021 and 2022. The Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jodhpur-II has carried out frontline demonstrations on moth bean crop covering an area of 30 ha of farmer’s field to exhibit latest production technologies and compared it with farmer’s practice. The study in total 45 frontline demonstrations were conducted on farmer’s fields in villages viz. Vijaynagar and Kheechan of Jodhpur district of Rajasthan, to demonstrate production potential and economic benefit of improved technologies comprising sowing method, nutrient management and chemical weed management and adoption of whole package of practices for crop. The findings of the study revealed that the demonstrated technology recorded a mean yield of 438 kg/ha which was 28.67 % higher than obtained with farmers practices (340 kg/ha). In per cent terms, scaling in productivity following improved technologies ranged from 27.94 to 29.41 %. Moreover, average yield gap for extension, technology and technology index were 98, 263 kg/ha and 37.49 per cent, respectively. Demonstrated technology also fetched average gross return of (` 23511/ha), net return(` 13091/ha), and additional return (` 4037/ha) in comparison to farmers practices. Demonstration of improved technologies also resulted in realizing higher incremental cost benefit ratio (5.34) with a Benefit: cost ratio of (2.22) compared to the farmers practice (1.97) during two years of study period.The frontline demonstrations conducted on moth beancrop at farmers field revealed that the adoption of improved technologies significantly increased the yield as well as the net returns higher than thefarmers practices. So, there is a need to disseminate the improved technologies among the farmers with effective extension methods like training and demonstrations.The farmers should be encouragedto adopt the recommended package of practices realizing for higher returns.

Keywords:Cluster,Frontline demonstration, Moth bean, Profitability

REFERENCES

Anonymous (2018). Rajasthan Agricultural Statistics at a glance, Statistical cell, Commissionerate of Agriculture, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur. available from:http//www. agriculture.rajasthan.gov.in/content/ agriculture/en/ agriculture- Department-dep/agriculture-Statistics.html.

Google Scholar

Anonymous (2019). Directorate of economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, cooperation and farmer welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and farmer welfare, available from:http//www. //ends.dacnet.nic.in/apy 96 to 06.htm.

Google Scholar

Badhala, B.S. and Bareth, L.S. (2013). Constraints of moth bean production technology in arid region of rajasthan.  Agriculture update, 8 (1/2), 93-97.

Google Scholar

Chandra, G. (2010). Evaluation of frontline demonstrations of greengram in Sunderban, West Bengal. Journal of Indian Society of Costal Agricultural Research, 28,12-15.

Google Scholar

Choudhary, A.K., Yadav, D.S. and Singh, A. (2009). Technological and Extension gaps in oilseeds in mandi district of Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development, 5 (1):1-6.

Google Scholar

DOA. (2021). Production and productivity of kharif pulses in Agro-climatic zone of Rajasthan.

Das, P.K. and Willey, R.W. (1991). A farmer participatory approach to the development of improved sustainable technologies for resource poor rainfed areas of the western plateau of India. Extension strategies for Rainfed Agriculture. Ed: Indian Society of Extension education, New Delhi.199-205.

Google Scholar

Kadian, K.S., Sharma, R. and Sharma, A.K. (1997). Evaluation of Frontline Demonstrations trials on oilseeds in Kangra valley of Himachal Pradesh. Annals of Agricultural Research, 18 (1), 40-43.

Google Scholar

Kumar, A.S.H. and Uppar, D.S. (2010). Infuence of integrated nutrient management on seed yield and quality of moth bean. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 20 (2), 394-396.

Google Scholar

Kumawat, S. Yadav, M.K. and Singh, I.P. (2017). Economic analysis of yield gap and constraints inhibiting the attainment of higher yield of moth bean in Rajasthan. International Journal of Agriculture Science, 9 (34), 4501-4503.

Google Scholar

Meena, M. L. and Singh, D. (2016). Productivity enhancement and gap analysis of moth bean (Vignaaccontifiilia (Jacq.)) through improved production technologies on farmer’s participatory mode. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development, 31(1), 68-71.

Google Scholar

Meena, O. P., Sharma, K. C., Meena, R.H. and Mitharval, B.S. (2012). Technology transfer through FLDs on mungbean in semi-arid region of Rajasthan. Rajasthan Journal of extension education, 20: 182-186.

Google Scholar

Narain, P. Singh, R.S. and Kumar, D. (2001). Drought and dew bean productivity in northwestern arid Rajasthan, India. Drought network news, 13(1), 28.

Google Scholar

Ofuya, Z.M. and Akhidue, V. (2005). The role of pulses in human nutrition: A review. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 9, 99-104.

Google Scholar

Patil, N.G., Ekale J.V. and Dhoke S.P. (2019). constraints faced by beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of KVK and their suggestions. International Journal of chemical studies, 7(5), 3387-3389.

Google Scholar

Rakhode, P.N. Koche, M.D. and Harne, A.D. (2011). Management of powdery mildew of greengram. Journal of Food Legume, 24(2), 120-122.

Google Scholar

Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K. Mandal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000).  Evaluation of Frontline Demonstrations trials on groundnut.  Journal of Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research, 18 (2), 180-183.

Google Scholar

Singh, D, Choudhary M and Meena ML. (2012). Indian rural technology of frontline demonstrations enhancing agriculture productivity under rainfed conditions of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Social Research, 53 (2), 141-151.

Google Scholar

Yadav, D.B, Kambhoj, D.K. and Garg, R.B. (2004). Increasing the productivity and profitability of sunflowers through frontline demonstrations in irrigated agro-ecosystem of eastern Haryana. Haryana Journal of Agronomy, 20(1), 33-35.

Google Scholar

Yadav, G.L., Kumawat, P.D. and Babel, A.L. (2004). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and Rhizobium inoculation on mothbean. Indian Journal of Pulses Research,17(1), 95-96.

Google Scholar