2022, Issue 9, Volume 14

DIVA-GIS ANALYSIS ON GEOGRAPHIC DIVERGENCE OF COWPEA GERMPLASM FOR RESISTANCE TO PULSE BEETLE, CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS L.

L. Saravanan and N. Sivaraj*

ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Regional Station, Hyderabad 500030

Email: sivarajn@gmail.com

Received-04.09.2022, Revised-14.09.2022, Accepted-29.09.2022

Abstract: Twenty four cowpea genotypes collected from different regions of Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu and Telangana States were evaluated for their reaction against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis. Seed traits viz., seed length, seed width, test seed weight and insect biological parameters viz., number of eggs laid/20 seeds, number of adults emerged/20 seeds, percent adult emergence, mean developmental period, insect growth index and percent seed weight loss were used to assess the spatial distribution and diversity in the reaction of cowpea germplasm against C. chinensis using DIVA-GIS applications. Traits viz., percent adult emergence, growth index and number of eggs/ 20 seeds exhibited high variability as evidenced by high co-efficient of variation (CV) of 27.3%, 26.45%  and 23.9% respectively. Moderately low CV values were observed for mean developmental period (0.83%) and number of adults emerged/20 seeds (4.74%). The study revealed that Adilabad district of Telangana and Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh were found highly diverse for all the traits including seed traits with high index values (1.433 – 2.000 for majority of the traits). The present findings would enable to identify the sources of resistance in cowpea germplasm geographically and spatially through grid maps.

Keywords: Cowpea, Callosobruchus chinensis, Cowpea resistance, DIVA-GIS, Geographical distribution

REFERENCES

Ali, S. M., Mahgoub, S. M., Hamed, M.S. and Gharib, M.S.A. (2004). Infestation potential of Callosobruchus chinensis and C. maculatus on certain broad bean seed varieties. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 82: 1127-1135.

Google Scholar

Azeez, O.M. and Pitan, O.O.R. (2014). Comparative seed resistance in eighty cowpea accessions to the seed bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Arch. Phytopath. Plant Protect, 47: 1806–1814.

Google Scholar

Babu Abraham, Kamala, V., Sivaraj, N., Sunil, N., Pandravada, S. R., Vanaja, M. and Varaprasad, K. S. (2010). DIVA-GIS approaches for diversity assessment of pod characteristics in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Curr. Sci., 98: 616–9.

Google Scholar

Ganeshaiah, K. N., Narayani Barve, Nilima Nath, Chandrashekar, A., Swamy, M and Uma Shaankar, R. (2003). Predicting the potential geographical distribution of the sugarcane woolly aphid using GARP and DIVA-GIS. Curr. Sci., 85: 1526-1528.

Google Scholar

Gopala Swamy, S.V.S., Kamakshi, N. and John Wesley, B. (2019). Relative susceptibility of chickpea varieties to pulse bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 7:442-446.

Google Scholar

Howe. (1971). A parameter for expressing the suitability of an environment for insect development. J. Stored prod. Res., 7:63-65.

Google Scholar

Ileke1, K.D., Odeyemi, O. O. and Ashamo, M.O. (2013). Varietal resistance of some cowpea cultivars to cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) infestation. FUTA J. Res. Sci.,1: 72- 81.

Google Scholar

Jackai, L.E.N. and Singh, S.R. (1988). Screening techniques for host plant resistance to insect pests of cowpea. Trop. Grain Legume Bull., 35: 2-18.

Google Scholar

Kpoviessi, A.D., Datinon, B., Agbahoungba, S., Agoyi, E.E., Chougourou, D.C., Sodedji, F.K.A. and Assogbadjo, A.E. (2020). Source of resistance among cowpea accessions to bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus F.Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae in Benin. Afr. Crop Sci. J., 28: 49 – 65.

Google Scholar

Mahendran, K. and Mohan, S. (2002). Technology adoption, estimation of loss and farmers behavior in pulses storage: A study in Western Tamil Nadu. Pestology, 26:35-38.

Google Scholar

Mohamed, E. M., Abdelmonem, A. E., Gharib, M. S. A. and Hafez, S. F. (2019). Susceptibility of some cowpea seed varieties to two storage bruchids infestation. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 97:121-134.

Google Scholar

Onofri, A. (2007). Routine statistical analyses of field experiments by using an Excel extension. Proceedings of 6th National Conference Italian Biometric Society: La statisticanelle scienze della vita e dell’ambiente, Pisa, pp. 93-96.

Google Scholar

Singh, B. B., Singh, S.R. and Adjadi, O. (1985). Bruchid resistance in cowpea. Crop Sci., 25: 736-739.

Google Scholar

Sivaraj, N., Sunil, N., Pandravada, S. R., Kamala V., Rao, B. V. S. K., Prasad, R. B. N., Nayar, E. R., Joseph John, K., Abraham, B. and Varaprasad, K. S. (2010). Fatty acid composition in seeds of Jack bean [Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC] and Sword bean [Canavalia gladiata (Jacq.)DC] germplasm from South India: A DIVA-GIS analysis. Seed Technol., 32:46–53.

Google Scholar

Sunil, N., Sivaraj, N., Anitha, K., Babu Abraham, Vinod Kumar, Sudhir, E., Vanaja, M. and Varaprasad, K. S. (2009). Analysis of diversity and distribution of Jatropha curcas L. germplasm using Geographic Information System (DIVA-GIS). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 56: 115-119.

Google Scholar

Tripathi, K., Chauhan, S. K., Gore, P. G., Prasad, T.V., Srinivasan, K and Bhalla, S. (2015). Screening of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] accessions against pulse-beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Legume Res., 38: 675–680.

Google Scholar

Tripathi, K., Prasad, T.V., Bhardwaj, R., Jha, S. K., Semwal, D.P., Gore, P.G., Sharma, P.K. and Bhalla, S. (2020). Evaluation of diverse germplasm of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] against bruchi [Callosobruchus maculates (Fab.)] and correlation with physical and biochemical parameters of seed. Plant Genet. Resour. Charact., 1-10.  

Google Scholar

Varaprasad, K. S., Sivaraj, N., Pandravada, S. R., Kamala, V. and Sunil, N. (2008). GIS mapping of agro biodiversity in Andhra Pradesh. Proc. Andhra Pradesh Acad. Sci., 12: 24–33.

Google Scholar