2022, Issue 5, Volume 14

MANAGEMENT OF MACROPHOMINA PHASEOLINA INDUCED CHARCOAL ROT OF COWPEA THROUGH BIOAGENTS AND FUNGICIDES UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS

View: Full Text Article

Nitika Kumari*, A.K. Meena, Vijay Shree Gahlot, Vinay Kumar Kardam and Hansraj Dhakar

Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner-334006, Rajasthan, India.

Email:nitikakumari0505@gmail.com

Received-30.04.2022, Revised-15.05.2022, Accepted-27.05.2022

Abstract: The charcoal rot of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) is caused by Macrophominaphaseolina. It affects many crops worldwide causing devastatingly high yield losses. No single control measures are found to be much effective owing to its soil-borne nature. In order to manage the disease, a field experiment was conducted to determine the effectiveness of biocontrol agentsviz., Trichodermaharzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescens and fungicides viz., tebuconazole 2DS, tebuconazole 50% + trifloxystrobin 25% WG, carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% WP and captan 70%WP were used alone as well as in combinations. When fungicides were applied as seed treatment and soil drench together, tebuconazole 50%+ trifloxystrobin 25% WG was proved to be most effective against charcoal rot by decreasing disease incidence and increasing grain yield followed by carbendazim 12% + mancozeb 63% WP.Seed treatment and foliar spray when applied alone, were found to be effective against M. phaseolina but the results revealed that they were less effective than combination treatment of fungicides. Bio-agents minimized the incidence of disease but to a lower extent than fungicides. A relatively more disease control was observed by T. harzianum followed by P. fluorescens.

Keywords: Charcoal rot, Macrophominaphaseolina,Pseudomonas fluorescens, Soil-borne, Trichoderma harzianum

REFERENCES

Boukar, O., Belko, N., Chamarthi, S., Togola, A., Batieno, J., Owusu, E. and Fatokun, C. (2019). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata): Genetics, genomics and breeding. Plant Breeding, 138 (4): 415–424.

Google Scholar

Cochran, W.G. and Cox, G.M. (1957). Experimental Designs, Second Edition, New York. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar

Cothran, R.D., Brown, J.M. and Relyea, R.A. (2013). Proximity to agriculture is correlated with pesticide tolerance: evidence for the evolution of amphibian resistance to modern pesticides. Evol. Appl., 6: 832-841.

Google Scholar

Dhingra, O. D. and Sinclair, J.B. (1978). Biology and pathology of Macrophominaphaseolina. Vicosa, M.G., Brazil:Universidade Federal de Vicosa Press, p. 125.

Google Scholar

Fisher, R.A. and Yates, F. (1963). Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, London. pp 146.

Google Scholar

Harman, G.E., Obregon, M.A., Samuels, G.J. and Lorito, M. (2010). Changing models for commercialization and implementation of biocontrol in the developing and the developed world. Plant Dis., 94 (8): 928-939.

Google Scholar

Jaiman, R.K., Jain, S.C. and Sharma, P. (2009). Field evaluation of fungicides, bioagents and soil amendments against root rot caused by Macrophominaphaseolinain clusterbean. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol., 39 (1): 74-76.

Google Scholar

Kaur, S., Dhillon, G. S., Brar, S. K., Vallad, G. E., Chand, R. and Chauhan, V. B. (2012). Emerging phytopathogen M. phaseolina: biology, economic importance and current diagnostic trends. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 38(2): 136–151.

Google Scholar

Khalilia, E., Javeda, M. A., Huyop, F., Rayatpanah, S., Jamshidi, S. and Wahab, R. A. (2016). Evaluation of Trichoderma isolates as potential biological control agent against soybean charcoal rot disease caused by Macrophominaphaseolina, Biotechnology& Biotechnological Equipment, 30(3): 479-488.

Google Scholar

Kumari, R., Shekhawat, K.S., Gupta, R. and Khokhar, M.K. (2012). Integrated management against root-rot of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] incited by Macrophominaphaseolina. Plant Pathol. Microb., 3 (5): 136-140.

Google Scholar

Lokesha, N. M. and Benagi, V. I. (2007).Biological management of pigeonpea dry root rot caused by Macrophominaphaseolina, Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.,20(1): 54-56.

Google Scholar

Meena, R. L., Godara, S. L., Meena, A. K., and Meena P. N. (2018). Evaluation of efficacy of different bioagents and fungicides against Rhizoctonia solani(Kuhn).Int.J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 7(9): 3694-3703.

Google Scholar

Muchero, W., Ehlers, J. D., Close, T. J. and Roberts, P. A. (2011). Genic SNP markers and legume synteny reveal candidate genes underlying QTL for M. phaseolina resistance and maturity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.]. BMC genomics, 12: 8.

Google Scholar

PainoD’urzo, M., Pedalino, M., Grillo, S., Rao, R. and Tucci, M.(1990). Variability in major seed proteins in different Vigna species. In: Cowpea genetic resources,IITA, 90-100.

Google Scholar

Pande, S. and Sharma, M. (2010). Climate Change: Potential Impact on Chickpea and PigeonpeaDiseases in the Rainfed Semi-Arid Tropics.  In 5th International Food Legumes Research Conference (IFLRCV) & 7th European Conference on Grain Legumes (AEP VII) April 26-30, Antalya, Turkey.

Google Scholar