Sachin Patidar1* and D.S. Tomar2
1Department of plant pathology, School of Agriculture Sciences, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University of Social Sciences, Dr. Ambedkar Nagar, Indore, MP, India
2Jawahrlal Neharu Krishi Vishwavidhalay Jabalpur, M.P. India
Received-05.02.2022, Revised-20.02.2022, Accepted-27.02.2022
Abstract: The presented experiment was conducted at Dr. B. R. AmbedkarSamajikVigyan Kendra Bordhi, Rehti, BRAUSS, Dr. Ambedkar Nagar in the rabi season 2019-20 and 2020-21. The field experiment was laid down in randomized block design with eight treatment and three replication. The eight treatment viz. Treatment T1 (Sulphur 80% WP), T2 (Azxystrobin 11 + Tebuconazole 18.3% WP), T3 (Azxystrobin 18.2 + Difenoconazole 11.4% SC), T4 (Tebuconazole 25% WG), T5 (TrichodermaViride 1% WP) T6 (Eucalyptus oil) T7 (Neem oil) and T8 (control) were evaluated. During the evaluation of the data in both year the yield loss per cent was ranges from 8.18% to 12.94%. The minimum average yield loss per cent war recorded in the treatment T2 (8.18%) followed by the treatment T1 (9.45%), T3 (8.33%), T4 (9.03%) and T5 (8.55%). Overall treatment T2 (Azxystrobin 11 + Tebuconazole 18.3% WP) performed very well during the experiment.
Keywords: Yield loss, Botanicals bio control and fungicide
References
Chowdhury, S. (1957). Studies on the development and control of fruit rot of chillies. Indian Phytopath. 10: 55-62.
Hadden, J.F. and Black, L.L. (1988). Anthracnose of Pepper Caused by Colletotrichumspp. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Integrated Management Practices: Tomato and Pepper Production in the Tropics; Taiwan; Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre. Pp. 189-199.
Panda, R., Panda, H., Prakash, K. and Panda, A. (2010). Prospects of Indian Chillies. Science tech entrepreneur, pp. 8.
Ramchandran, N., Madhavi, R.K. and Rathnamma, K. (2007). Current status of chilli anthracnose in India. The first International Symposium on chilli Anthracnose. 25, Coventioncentre, Seoul National University, Korea, pp. 26.