2019, Issue 12, Volume 11

INFLUENCE OF SULPHUR AND ZINC ON GROWTH, YIELD, QUALITY AND ECONOMICS OF INDIAN MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA) UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS

Pradeep Kumar Rana, Pawan Sirotia, U.S. Mishra, Baijnath Yadav* and
Abhilesh pratap singh

Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya, Chitrakoot,

Satna- 485 780 (M.P.)

Received-05.12.2019, Revised-27.12.2019

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted during the  winter seasons of 2013-14 and 2014-15 in Chitrakoot – Satna,  Madhya Pradesh, India, to study the effects of 5 sulphur levels (0, 15,30,45 and 60 kg S ha-1) and 4 zinc levels (0, 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 kg Zn ha-1)  on rainfed Indian mustard (cv. Pusa Tarak). Progressive increase in P and Zn levels increased the yield attributes and seed yield, but the increase in seed yield was significant only up to 45 kg S ha-1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha-1.  Seed yield increased significantly up to 45 kg S ha-1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha-1 application. Significantly higher seed yield (1685.2 kg ha-1) was recorded with 45 kg S x 7.5 kg Zn ha‑1  followed by 60 kg S x 7.5 kg Zn, 30 kg S x 5.0 kg Zn  and 45 kg S x 5.0 kg Znand these treatments combination were comparable from each other. Oil and protein content also increased up to 30 kg S and 5 kg Zn ha-1.

Keywords: Mustard, Quality, Seed yield, Sulphur, Zinc

REFERENCES

A.O.A.C. (1984). Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. Edn, 14.  Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, D. C., U.S.A.

Ahamad, A., Khan, I. and Abdin, M.Z. (2000). Effect of sulphur fertilization on oil accumulation, Acetyl – CoA concentration and Acetyl- CoA carbohydrate activity in the developing grain of rapegrain (Brassica comprestries L.). Australian J. of Agril. Res. 51: 1023-1029.

Aulakh, M. S., Pasricha, N. S. and Sahota, N. S. (1980). Yield, nutrient concentration and quality of mustard crop as influenced by nitrogen and sulphur fertilizers. Journal Agricultural Science Cambridge, 94 : 545-549.

Deo, Chandra and Khandewal, R. B. (2009). Effect of Zinc and Phosphorus on yield, nutrient uptake and oil content of mustard grown on the gypsum treated sodic soil. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 57(1) : 66-70.

Dongarkar, K.P., Pawar, W.S., Khawale, V.S., Khutate, N.G. and Gudadhe, N.N. (2005). Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on growth and yield of mustard , Journal of Soil and Crop, 15, 165-167.

Havlin, L. J., Beaton, D. J., Tisdale, L. S. and Nelson, L. W. (1999). Soil fertility and fertilizers. Prentice Hall of Indian, 6th Ed. pp. 227-228, 277, 319-346.

Jat, J. R. and Mehra, R. K. (2007). Effect of sulphur and zinc on yield, macronutrient content in and uptake by mustard on Haplustepts. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 55: 190-195.

Raman and Trivedi, S. K. (2012). Effect of levels and sources of sulphur on yield, quality and nutrient uptake by mustard, Progressive agriculture 12 (1) : 69-73.

Meena, M. C., Patel, K. P. and Rathod, D. D. (2006). Effect of zinc, iron and sulphur on mustard in loamy sand soil. Indian Journal of Fertilisers; 2(5):55-58.

Muralidharudu, Y. and Singh, M. (1990). Effect of iron and zinc application on yield, oil content and their uptake by sesame. J. of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 38: 171-173.

Pable, D., Patil., D. B. and Deshmukh, P. W. (2010). Effect of sulphur and zinc on yield and quality of soybean. Asian J. Soil Sci., 5: 315- 317.

Singh, Anar and Meena, N.I. (2004). Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on growth, yield attributes and seed yield of mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 49(3): 186-188.

Sonune, B.A., Naphade, P.S. and Kankal, D.S. (2001). Effect of zinc and sulphur on protein and oil content of soybean. Agric. Sci. Digest, 21: 259- 260.

Yadav, R. B., Singh, R. V., Singh, H. R. and Yadav, H. S. (2007).Effect of different levels of zinc and sulphur on Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Crop Research (Hisar); 33(1/3):74-76.

Zizala, V. J., Jadav, N. B. and Gorfad, P. S. (2008). Effect of sulphur and zinc on yield, quality and its concentration on mustard. Asian Journal of Soil Science; 3(1):173-177.