Gokaran Meena and M.M. Syamal
Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, B.H.U., Varanasi (U.P.)
1, Department of Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences,
B.H.U., Varanasi (U.P.)
2 Department of Department of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, B.H.U.,
Varanasi (U.P.)
Email: rajeshpatho@gmail.com
Abstract: Ring budding gave better response than patch and shield budding with respect to bud take, bud sprouting and vegetative growth followed by patch budding, while shield budding showed poor response. Budding performed on 15th June showed better response with respect to all the character studied followed by 30th June and budding done on 15th April showed poor response. On the basis of the above observation, it is concluded that there is tremendous possibilities of commercialization of asexual propagation in ber by adopting ring budding performed on 15th June followed by 30th June.
Keywords: Ring budding, patch budding, shield budding, bud sprouting
REFERENCES
Bailey, L.H. (1947). The standard cyclopedia of Horticulture, Macmillan & Co., New York, pp.3547-8
Joolka, N.K. and Rindhe, A.B. (2000). A note on the effect of method and time of budding on bud take in kinnow mandarin. Hariyana Journal of Horticulture science, 15:54-56
Kaundal, G.S. and Deol, I.S. (1990). Budding technique in clonal propagation og guava. Horticultural Journal, 231: 186-191
Mawani, P.B. and Singh, S.P (1992). Effect of method and time of budding on budding success in ber cv. Umran. Horticultural Journal, 5:31-35.