C.K. Verma, S.S. Bharti and R.B. Yadav*
Department of Agronomy,
Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur-208002 (U.P.)
*Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut-250110 (U.P.)
Abstract: A field experiment was carried out to know the effect of fertilizer i.e. control, 40 N + 15 S, 80 N + 30 S and 120 N + 45 S kg ha-1 and moisture conservation practices i.e control, dust mulch created by weeding and hoeing at 25 and 35 DAS and organic mulch@ 5 t ha-1 of paddy straw at 25 DAS on mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj & Cosson]’ at students instructional farm of C. S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur (U.P.), during Rabi season of 2008-09 and 2009-10. Results reveals that fertilizer 120 N + 45 S kg ha-1 gave significantly higher plant height, number of primary branches plant-1, number of secondary branches plant-1, dry matter accumulation plant-1, siliquae length, number of siliqua plant-1, number of seeds siliqua-1, 1000-seed weight, grain yield, stover yield, harvest index and protein content (%) than other levels of fertilizers i.e. control, 40 N + 15 S and 80 N + 30 S, during both years. However, the application of moisture conservation practices i.e. dust mulch creating by weeding and hoeing at 25 and 35 DAS and organic mulch@ 5 t ha-1 of paddy straw at 25 DAS increased growth, yield attributing characters and seed yield as well as nutrient content and nutrient uptake by mustard over control. On the basis of economics use of 120 N + 45 S kg ha-1 and organic mulch@ 5 t ha-1 of paddy straw at 25 DAS was found most profitable.
Key words: Mustard, Moisture conservation practices, Fertilizer, Nutrient and Economics
REFERENCES
Bhan, S.; Uttam, S.K. and Tripathi, R.Y. (1997). Yield, moisture use and root development of rainfed mustard as influenced by sowing method and moisture conservation practices. Indian J. Soil Cons., 25(1): 55-60.
Ghanbahadur, M.R.; Lanjewar, R.K.; Shinde. V.S. and Patil, S.M. (2005). Effect of sowing dates, irrigation levels and mulching on growth and yield of Indian mustard. Annals of Plant Physiology, 19(1) : 49-55.
Giri, M.D.; Abdul, H.; Giri, D.G., Kumar, P.P.; Mohammad, S.; Hamid, A. and Sajid, M. (2003). Effect of irrigation and source of sulphur on quality and uptake of nutrients of mustard. J. soils crops,13 (1): 131-134.
Gogoi, P.K.; Dutta, N.C. and Zalil, A. (2002). Effect of sowing date and mulching on summer groundnut under rain fed condition, Bioved, 13(1/2): 33-37.
Katiyar, A.K. (2000). Effect of fertility level and moisture conservation practices on barley bases inter cropping system with mustard under rain fed condition. Ph.D. Thesis, department of Soil Conservation and Water Management, C. S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur.
Kumar, M. and Premi, O.P. (2003). Effect of paddy mulch on soil moisture and yield of rain fed mustard. Agric. Digest., 801, 23(3): 183-186.
Ram, Mangat; Singh, Ishwar and Kumar, A. (2002). Production potential of mustard varieties under varying irrigation condition and fertilizer levels. Hariyana J. Agron., 18 (1&2): 51-53.
Reddy, B.N. and Sinha, M.N. (1987). Effect of irrigation and fertilization on yield and economics of Indian mustard. J. Oilseeds, Res., 4: 202-210.
Sachan, S.S.; Singh, R.K. and Koshta, S.K. (1997). Effect of nitrogen level, row spacing and moisture conservation practices on rainfed mustard on eroded soil. Indian J. Soil. Cons., 25 (1): 84-85.
Tiwari, R.C.; Singh, S.K. and Pandey, D.K. (1992). Influence of sulphur application on yield and chemical composition of some crops. Ferti. News, 37(6): 23-26.Singh, A. and Meena, N.L. (2004). Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on growth, yield attributes and yield of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in eastern plains of Rajasthan. Indian j. Agron.,49 (3): 126-188.